GSpaRC: Gaussian Splatting for Real-time Reconstruction of RF Channels

1Texas A&M University, 2New York University

Abstract

Channel state information (CSI) is essential for adaptive beamforming and maintaining robust links in wireless communication systems. However, acquiring CSI incurs significant overhead, consuming up to 25% of spectrum resources in 5G networks due to frequent pilot transmissions at millisecond-scale intervals. Recent approaches aim to reduce this burden by reconstructing CSI from spatiotemporal RF measurements, such as signal strength and direction-of-arrival. While effective in offline settings, these methods often suffer from inference latencies in the 5-100 ms range, making them impractical for real-time systems. We present GSpaRC: Gaussian Splatting for Real-time Reconstruction of RF Channels, a method that achieves accurate channel reconstruction with latency in the low-millisecond regime or below. GSpaRC represents the RF environment using a compact set of 3D Gaussian primitives, each parameterized by a lightweight neural model augmented with physics-informed features such as distance-based attenuation. Unlike traditional vision-based splatting pipelines, GSpaRC is tailored for RF reception: it employs an equirectangular projection onto a hemispherical surface centered at the receiver to reflect omnidirectional antenna behavior. A custom CUDA pipeline enables fully parallelized directional sorting, splatting, and rendering across frequency and spatial dimensions. Evaluated on multiple RF datasets, GSpaRC achieves similar CSI reconstruction fidelity to recent state-of-the-art methods while reducing training and inference time by over an order of magnitude. These results illustrate that modest GPU computation can substantially reduce pilot overhead, making GSpaRC a scalable low-latency approach for channel estimation in 5G and future wireless systems.

Pipeline

GSpaRC Pipeline

Overview of the GSpaRC pipeline. Anisotropic 3D Gaussians are splatted at the receiver position; each Gaussian's complex emission is predicted by a lightweight MLP. The transmitter position is constant, so the MLP is conditioned on the receiver position. The rasterizer accumulates contributions into a directional spectrum, supervised against ground-truth measurements during training.

Confidence-Aware Reconstruction

Confidence Analysis

Example confidence distribution and pilot-free coverage on the Argos dataset. (a) Positions with high confidence predicted by GSpaRC require no pilot transmission. (b) Coverage curve showing pilot-free fraction vs. confidence threshold. GSpaRC identifies the approx 70% of receiver positions that exceed the accuracy threshold for downstream tasks.

Datasets and Results

We evaluate GSpaRC on three datasets covering both spectrum and CSI reconstruction: (1) a Sionna ray-traced indoor scene, (2) the real-world RFID spectrum dataset, and (3) the real-world Argos massive-MIMO CSI dataset. Across all three, GSpaRC matches or exceeds prior state-of-the-art reconstruction quality while reducing inference time by over an order of magnitude.

1. Sionna Simulation Dataset

To evaluate GSpaRC in a controlled yet realistic propagation environment, we generate an indoor dataset using the Sionna ray tracer. We use a conference room scene spanning 14m x 10m with a 4m ceiling, including tables, chairs, glass partitions, and irregular wall materials that create rich multipath propagation.

Sionna Conference Room Scene

(a) Conference room scene used for Sionna ray-tracing.

Spectrum Comparison

(b) Spectrum reconstruction. Left to right: ground truth, GSpaRC, and GSRF.

Sionna Conference Room

Algorithm SSIM ↑ MSE ↓ Train (hrs)
NeRF² 0.69 0.00513 4.15
WRFGS+ 0.71 0.00550 3.67
GSRF 0.70 0.00512 1.1
GSpaRC 0.78 0.00417 1.0

2. RFID Spectrum Dataset

We evaluate GSpaRC on the publicly available RFID Spectrum NeRF² dataset. The receiver is fixed at 915 MHz with a 4×4 antenna array, and an RFID tag transmitter is placed at 6,123 distinct locations, each yielding a spatial spectrum image. GSpaRC matches the best baseline in SSIM while delivering more than 20× faster rendering.

RFID Dataset

Algorithm SSIM ↑ MSE ↓ Render (ms) ↓
WRFGS+ 0.78 0.0112 8
NeRF² 0.75 0.0101 230
GSRF 0.82 0.0094 23
GSpaRC 0.82 0.0134 0.8

3. Argos Massive-MIMO CSI Dataset

Beyond spectrum reconstruction, GSpaRC predicts complex-valued CSI at unseen receiver positions. We evaluate this on the real-world Argos massive-MIMO dataset, an outdoor deployment with a 64-antenna base station at 2.4 GHz across 4,000 user positions. GSpaRC achieves SNR comparable to GSRF while reducing rendering latency by nearly 6×.

Argos Dataset (CSI Reconstruction, antenna 0, 800 test samples)

Method SNR 1-SC (dB) ↑ SNR 26-SCs (dB) ↑ NMSE ↓ Render (ms) ↓
GSRF 23.62 20.87 0.0247 22.76
GSpaRC 23.52 19.59 0.0110 3.86

Downstream Tasks

We evaluate the utility of GSpaRC-predicted CSI for real-time communication tasks using the real-world Argos CSI dataset. These downstream evaluations demonstrate that our confidence-aware approach can effectively replace pilot-based estimation in practical wireless systems.

Confidence-Aware Link Adaptation

Our spatially grounded representation supports real-time link adaptation. By predicting channel quality across receiver locations, GSpaRC enables effective Modulation and Coding Scheme (MCS) selection, achieving throughput nearly identical to that obtained with ground-truth CSI.

MCS Selection Error

MCS Selection Error Distribution

Link Adaptation Throughput

Effective Throughput CDF

Confidence-Aware Communication

GSpaRC-reconstructed channels enable accurate symbol detection. We evaluate Bit Error Rate (BER) and Block Error Rate (BLER) across different signal-to-noise ratios, demonstrating that our real-time reconstruction matches the performance of perfect CSI in practical regimes.

PoC for Communications

BibTeX

@article{nukapotula2026gsparc,
  title     = {GSpaRC: Gaussian Splatting for Real-time Reconstruction of RF Channels},
  author    = {Nukapotula, Bhavya Sai and Tripathi, Rishabh and Pregler, Seth and Kalathil, Dileep and Shakkottai, Srinivas and Rappaport, Tedd},
  journal   = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.22793},
  year      = {2026},
}